[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: haskell-cafe
Subject: Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell I/O inside: down the rabbit's hole
From: Bulat Ziganshin <bulat.ziganshin () gmail ! com>
Date: 2006-06-30 10:45:44
Message-ID: 984261383.20060630144544 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Hello Krasimir,
Friday, June 30, 2006, 2:26:53 PM, you wrote:
> In the last section you said that IO has the same definition in GHC
> and Hugs. As far as I can remember in Hugs IO is defined as:
> newtype IO a = IO ((a -> IOResult) -> (IOError -> IOResult) -> IOResult)
> Of course this definition is builtin and cann't be seen in the Haskell
> source code.
i'm not sure about this - can this be considered as an example of this
RealWorld strategy or not. Feel free to edit text if you know the
right answer
--
Best regards,
Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic