[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       haskell
Subject:    [Haskell] Re: ANNOUNCE: container-classes-0.0.0.0
From:       Ivan Miljenovic <ivan.miljenovic () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-07-18 13:39:47
Message-ID: AANLkTimZaHqZyN8p-ACDw_muUnMjCiwFK8R5a40kRevz () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 18 July 2010 23:35, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljenovic@gmail.com> wrote:
> * Someone's asked me why I don't define a Traversable-like class.  The
>  reason is is that I haven't gotten around to it yet ;-) (as well as a
>  great many other things).

Ugh, I got Traversable mixed up with Foldable (I didn't get enough
sleep on the weekend and I should hit the sack now).  I've integrated
fold right into the definition of Container, and everything else comes
straight from that so I didn't see the point of making an explicit
sub-class (or a super-class, take your pick) just for that.



-- 
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]