[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       hadoop-dev
Subject:    Re: hadoop-2.5 - June end?
From:       Sangjin Lee <sjlee0 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-06-28 2:38:18
Message-ID: CADbBEnvEzgdf1r26pivB4T56w-UkY6X+Pw9H52B+sx5C1nWXXw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


Hi Karthik,

Regarding YARN-1492 (shared cache), it should not hold up 2.5 if it is not
there. If it's not there, it's not there.

Also, FYI, since it turns out the changes are not too large and should not
have a lot of conflicts, we're thinking of not using a separate branch.

Regards,
Sangjin


On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Karthik Kambatla <kasha@cloudera.com>
wrote:

> Spoke to Vinod offline. The tentative plan is cut branch-2.5 middle of next
> week and work towards getting the remaining blockers in as soon as
> possible.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Karthik Kambatla <kasha@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Including YARN-1695 makes sense, just made it a blocker to ensure we get
> > it in. YARN-1492 - would be great if we get it in, but I am not sure how
> > feasible it is. Given it is being developed on a branch, there is also
> the
> > merge to trunk and branch-2 overhead.
> >
> > I would prefer branching soon so we can work towards stabilizing the
> > branch. People can continue to commit blockers to branch-2.5.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
> > vinodkv@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Like I mentioned before, I'd like to get RM-webservices : YARN-1695
> >> included. May be we can wait for the branch till that point of time.
> >>
> >> I am also pushing for Shared Cache: YARN-1492 reviews. Again, like I
> said
> >> before, we can take it as we go.
> >>
> >> +Vinod
> >> Hortonworks Inc.
> >> http://hortonworks.com/
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Karthik Kambatla <kasha@cloudera.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi folks,
> >> >
> >> > For 2.5, looks like there are only 6 JIRAs marked Blocker and another
> 19
> >> > Critical ones [1]. I guess it makes sense to cut a branch for 2.5 and
> >> work
> >> > on getting the remaining items in.
> >> >
> >> > I ll go ahead and create the 2.5 branch in the next couple of days. I
> >> hope
> >> > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToReleasePostMavenization is the
> right
> >> > steps to follow.
> >> >
> >> > [1] JIRA Query: project in (Hadoop, HDFS, YARN, MapReduce) AND
> >> resolution =
> >> > Unresolved AND "Target Version/s" = 2.5.0 AND priority in (Blocker)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
> >> > vinodkv@apache.org
> >> > > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I started reviewing YARN-1492 and synced up offline with Sangjin and
> >> > Chris
> >> > > who are leading this. I proposed that we should get the reviews and
> >> > commits
> >> > > going as they go and then mark the feature alpha, beta or stable
> >> > depending
> >> > > on how far we are ahead with the feature and how it aligns with the
> >> > release
> >> > > in progress.
> >> > >
> >> > > +Vinod
> >> > >
> >> > > On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > It would be great if we can consider the shared cache (YARN-1492)
> as
> >> > part
> >> > > > of 2.5. It obviously will depend on the reviews from folks, but
> the
> >> > > feature
> >> > > > itself should be reasonably solid.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > Sangjin
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Arun C Murthy <
> acm@hortonworks.com
> >> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> Thanks Karthik!
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> I've updated https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Roadmap with
> features
> >> > which
> >> > > >> are very close to completion. Let's see if that makes sense and
> if
> >> we
> >> > > get
> >> > > >> any further feedback.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Arun
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Karthik Kambatla <
> kasha@cloudera.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>> I can pick up the RM duties for 2.5. If I run into any HDFS
> >> doubts, I
> >> > > >> might
> >> > > >>> need some help from someone more familiar with HDFS.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Arun C Murthy <
> >> acm@hortonworks.com
> >> > >
> >> > > >> wrote:
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>> Folks,
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> I'd appreciate some help here. Due to family reasons (all good
> >> > ones),
> >> > > >>>> I'll be away for a couple of weeks. Can someone else pick up
> the
> >> RM
> >> > > >> duties
> >> > > >>>> for hadoop-2.5? Maybe Andrew since he's expressed interest in
> the
> >> > > past?
> >> > > >> I
> >> > > >>>> will pick up the thread again for hadoop-2.6, but I don't want
> to
> >> > > block
> >> > > >>>> hadoop-2.5 due to my non-availability.
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> thanks,
> >> > > >>>> Arun
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Arun C Murthy <acm@hortonworks.com
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>> Folks,
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>> As you can see from the Roadmap wiki, it looks like several
> >> items
> >> > are
> >> > > >>>> still a bit away from being ready.
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>> I think rather than wait for them, it will be useful to create
> >> an
> >> > > >>>> intermediate release (2.5) this month - I think ATS security is
> >> > pretty
> >> > > >>>> close, so we can ship that. I'm thinking of creating hadoop-2.5
> >> by
> >> > end
> >> > > >> of
> >> > > >>>> the month, with a branch a couple of weeks prior.
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>> Thoughts?
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>> thanks,
> >> > > >>>>> Arun
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> --
> >> > > >>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >> > > >>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual
> or
> >> > > >> entity to
> >> > > >>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> >> > > confidential,
> >> > > >>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
> >> the
> >> > > >> reader
> >> > > >>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> >> > notified
> >> > > >> that
> >> > > >>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure
> or
> >> > > >>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> >> have
> >> > > >>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> >> > > >> immediately
> >> > > >>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> --
> >> > > >> Arun C. Murthy
> >> > > >> Hortonworks Inc.
> >> > > >> http://hortonworks.com/hdp/
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> --
> >> > > >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >> > > >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> >> > > entity to
> >> > > >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> >> > confidential,
> >> > > >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
> the
> >> > > reader
> >> > > >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> >> notified
> >> > > that
> >> > > >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> >> > > >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> >> have
> >> > > >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> >> > > immediately
> >> > > >> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >> > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> >> entity
> >> > to
> >> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> >> confidential,
> >> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> >> reader
> >> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified
> >> > that
> >> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> >> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> >> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> >> > immediately
> >> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> >> to
> >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> >> that
> >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> >> immediately
> >> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >>
> >
> >
>


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]