[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gtkmm
Subject:    Re: Is it really a documentation bug regardless
From:       "Murray Cumming" <murrayc () murrayc ! com>
Date:       2006-09-29 8:15:42
Message-ID: 26870.194.138.18.132.1159517742.squirrel () webmail ! murrayc ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


> Hello,
>
> I found the Gdk::Pixbuf::get_from_drawable() method in the
> documentation mentioned on the "Gdk::Drawable Class Reference" page. I
> could not find method description on the "Gdk::Pixbuf Class
> Reference". I typed this in Google and found this message:
>
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtkmm-list/2003-October/msg00200.html
>
> Message is dated on Thu, 16 Oct 2003. It is explained there, that this
> is a documenation bug. The question is this bug still exists and was
> not added to the bugzilla? Seems it is not difficult to correct this
> bug if it is.

Probably, yes. This is what happens when bugs are not entered in bugzilla.

Murray Cumming
murrayc@murrayc.com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com

_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
gtkmm-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic