[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gtkmm
Subject:    Re: [[gtkmm] Property Accessors ]
From:       Murray Cumming <murrayc () usa ! net>
Date:       2001-12-22 15:43:47
[Download RAW message or body]

Karl Nelson <kenelson@ece.ucdavis.edu> wrote:
> =

> Code checks fine.  Will check in tonight.
> =

> Some minor questions...
> =

> * Can we drop the _value on set_value and get_value?  They are =

>   totally superfluous.  The fact is a property is enough to
>   know that it has a value.  After all every method is prepended
>   with _value now. =


In future there might be property change notification methods/accessors t=
oo,
so I'd like to keep these explicit and informative.

Murray Cumming
murrayc@usa.net
www.murrayc.com

_______________________________________________
to unsubscribe or change your subscription parameters :
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-main
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]