[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gtk-devel
Subject: Re: migrating gtk
From: Kristian Rietveld <kris () loopnest ! org>
Date: 2018-02-10 21:26:54
Message-ID: 9342E17C-4033-47BB-BD32-F9CCB3704A9B () loopnest ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
> On 05 Feb 2018, at 11:37, Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Of course if we get a positive response that the bug is still there
> we're going to migrate it and keep track of it.
>
> > With that in mind, I believe it is much nicer to just leave the old bugs there.
>
> The old bugs will be left there, but closed, so we don't need to check
> two bug lists, and split the maintenance resources even more.
What about old bugs that will not receive a response right now / in the very near \
future? Can these still be migrated at a later point? I gather there's a script to do \
this on a case-by-case basis?
And I assume all data in bugzilla.gnome.org will remain accessible for quite some \
time to come? This is an important archive of information.
regards,
-kris.
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic