[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gtk-devel
Subject:    Re: GIO API review
From:       Alexander Larsson <alexl () redhat ! com>
Date:       2007-12-17 9:20:29
Message-ID: 1197883229.26872.1.camel () dhcp-208-188 ! arn ! redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 15:49 +0100, Sven Herzberg wrote:
> Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > I'm for <gio/gio.h>. It seems more inline with all our other libraries.
> > Only gobject does the <glib-object.h> thing.
> >   
> 
> Shouldn't <gio.h> be enough? This would really drop 4 letters that every
> gio-using developer had to type and which are really redundant. I really
> don't like this <foobar/foobar.h> style because it forces developers
> just to type more than they IMHO should.

I'm not wedded to any particular version. <gio.h> may conflict with
another include dir namespace, but since its just one file that is
probably safe. The double dir version seems more commonly used in
general though. 

Other peoples opinions?

_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]