[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gtk-devel
Subject:    Re: GTK+ 2.7.0 released [unstable]
From:       Bill Haneman <Bill.Haneman () Sun ! COM>
Date:       2005-06-21 13:51:53
Message-ID: 42B81B79.3010601 () sun ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Owen Taylor wrote:

>On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 07:19 -0400, Mike Emmel wrote:
>  
>
>>No atk ?
>>
>>Does the current released version work or should it be from cvs ?
>>    
>>
>
>Current released should be fine as far as I know. I haven't
>really tracked what's going on in CVS for ATK.
>
>  
>
1.10.1 should be fine

http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/atk/1.10/atk-1.10.1.tar.bz2

It's substantially equivalent to HEAD.

Bill

>Regards,
>					Owen
>
>  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>gnome-hackers mailing list
>gnome-hackers@gnome.org
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
>  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]