[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gtk-devel
Subject:    Re: gobject doc import
From:       Tim Janik <timj () gtk ! org>
Date:       2004-11-27 17:31:57
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.61.0411271830490.28736 () birgrave ! birnet ! private
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Ross Golder wrote:

> On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 16:42 +0100, Tim Janik wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Ross Golder wrote:
>>
>>> On =FF=FF., 2004-11-16 at 08:54 +0100, Mathieu Lacage wrote:
>>>> hi,
>>>>
>>>> There was no comment to my previous mail to gnome-hackers asking wheth=
er
>>>> I should import or not my gobject documentation into cvs.gnome.org. I
>>>> take this silence as a yes. Would you mind copying the cvs repository
>>>> archive located there to cvs.gnome.org in a suitably-named module such
>>>> as gobject-doc (or whatever you like best) ?
>>>>
>>>> http://le-hacker.org/gobject.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>
>>> Couldn't think of a better name, so its now in place as the
>>> 'gobject-doc' module.
>>>
>>> http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gobject-doc/
>>
>> was there any reason (license? dependencies?) not to have this in glib i=
tself,
>> or maybe even integrate it into the glib docs?
>>
>
> No real reason (that I know of). If it is deemed more appropriate to be
> incorporated into an already-existing module, please ask the relevant
> module maintainer to send/approve a request, and we will move it.

i'd definitely like to see the docs merged into glib. however that takes
someone who's willing to tackle the build issues involved, not mere
CVS file movement.

>
> Regards,
>
>

---
ciaoTJ

_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]