[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gtk
Subject: Re: Question about dbus ifaces
From: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi () gmail ! com>
Date: 2015-03-06 20:36:03
Message-ID: CALnHYQET3t8v8a+5xmm1DmP1BziVZhnzO5GEms-JYkzXzdF85A () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
Hi;
You probably want to ask on gtk-devel-list, but I can give you a quick
answer: those interfaces are still considered unstable and may be subject
to change while we explore the various issues of exposing them. Once they
get more stable, they will be proposed on XDG-list. If you notice,
org.gtk.Application is already partially exposed as
org.freedesktop.Application after a round of discussions on fd.o.
As to the "it's simple" remark, we'll have to disagree. :-) there's nothing
more time consuming than proposing a spec on freedesktop.org, so we
generally do that once we have a pretty good idea of the problem space.
Ciao,
Emmanuele.
On Friday, 6 March 2015, Konstantin P. <ria.freelander@gmail.com> wrote:
> I see for now GNOME have many "semi-private" dbus interfaces like
> org.gtk.Menus, org.gtk.Application, org.gtk.Actions and even
> org.gtk.Notifications (altrough org.freedesktop.Notifications exists).
>
> Why GNOME does not send these interfaces to FDO review? It is in fact very
> simple, AFAIK.
>
--
https://www.bassi.io
[@] ebassi [@gmail.com]
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
Hi;<div><br></div><div>You probably want to ask on gtk-devel-list, but I can give you \
a quick answer: those interfaces are still considered unstable and may be subject to \
change while we explore the various issues of exposing them. Once they get more \
stable, they will be proposed on XDG-list. If you notice, org.gtk.Application is \
already partially exposed as org.freedesktop.Application after a round of \
discussions on fd.o.</div><div><br></div><div>As to the "it's simple" \
remark, we'll have to disagree. :-) there's nothing more time consuming than \
proposing a spec on <a href="http://freedesktop.org">freedesktop.org</a>, so we \
generally do that once we have a pretty good idea of the problem \
space.</div><div><br></div><div>Ciao,</div><div> Emmanuele.<br><br>On Friday, 6 \
March 2015, Konstantin P. <<a \
href="mailto:ria.freelander@gmail.com">ria.freelander@gmail.com</a>> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px \
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I see for now GNOME have many \
"semi-private" dbus interfaces like org.gtk.Menus, org.gtk.Application, \
org.gtk.Actions and even org.gtk.Notifications (altrough \
org.freedesktop.Notifications exists).<div><br></div><div>Why GNOME does not send \
these interfaces to FDO review? It is in fact very simple, AFAIK.</div></div> \
</blockquote></div><br><br>-- <br><a href="https://www.bassi.io" \
target="_blank">https://www.bassi.io</a><br>[@] ebassi [@<a href="http://gmail.com" \
target="_blank">gmail.com</a>]<br>
_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic