'FW: newbie question(s)'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List: grub-bug
Subject: FW: newbie question(s)
From: "Guillermo Gutierrez" <ggutierrez () marketscan ! com>
Date: 2004-12-15 14:16:57
Message-ID: FD596851B634D04E9953F3BB26893896B58AF4 () artemis ! marketscan ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]

can anyone tell me if the *_STAGE1_5 are obsolete with GRUB 0.95?
Is that why the version number goes down one when I include them in the hdd install \
of GRUB?  
-----Original Message-----
From: bug-grub-bounces+ggutierrez=marketscan.com@gnu.org \
[mailto:bug-grub-bounces+ggutierrez=marketscan.com@gnu.org]On Behalf Of Guillermo \
                Gutierrez
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 9:36 AM
To: bug-grub@gnu.org
Subject: newbie question(s)

hello, 
I just signed up today so please forgive me if I ask a repeated question. 
I wanted to find out, is it normal for the version number to go down by one when \
installing GRUB to the HDD?  I got a hold of a *.img file that when written to a \
floppy and booted to, it displays the 0.95 version number.  If I follow some HOW-TOs \
for installing GRUB on the HDD by copying the stage1 and 2 files as well as the \
*_stage1_5 files to a /boot/grub directory and then run setup(hd*) from the GRUB \
command line then the version number drops to 0.94.

Is this supposed to happen? Did I do something wrong or am I following some outdated \
install guides? 

Guillermo Gutierrez 
Market Scan Information Systems 
Software Q.A. Supervisor 
(818) 575-2000 x2427 
ggutierrez@marketscan.com 

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE>newbie question(s)</TITLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1479" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV>can anyone tell me if the *_STAGE1_5 are obsolete with 
GRUB 0.95?</DIV>
<DIV>Is that why the version number goes down one when I 
include them in the hdd install of GRUB?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left>-----Original Message----- From: 
bug-grub-bounces+ggutierrez=marketscan.com@gnu.org 
[mailto:bug-grub-bounces+ggutierrez=marketscan.com@gnu.org]On Behalf Of 
Guillermo Gutierrez Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 9:36 
AM To: bug-grub@gnu.org Subject: newbie 
question(s) </DIV>
hello, I just signed up today so please forgive me 
if I ask a repeated question. I wanted to find out, is it normal for the version number to go 
down by one when installing GRUB to the HDD? I got a hold of a *.img file that when 
written to a floppy and booted to, it displays the 0.95 version 
number. If I follow 
some HOW-TOs for installing GRUB on the HDD by copying the stage1 and 2 files as 
well as the *_stage1_5 files to a /boot/grub directory and then run setup(hd*) 
from the GRUB command line then the version number drops to 0.94.
Is this supposed to happen? Did I 
do something wrong or am I following some outdated install guides? 

Guillermo 
Gutierrez Market Scan Information Systems 
 Software Q.A. 
Supervisor (818) 575-2000 x2427 ggutierrez@marketscan.com 
</BODY></HTML>

["ATT399263.txt" (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
Bug-grub mailing list
Bug-grub@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 