[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       groovy-user
Subject:    [groovy-user] Re: Fields in parent class are not set when calling map constructor of subclass when @
From:       youjay <gr8ggsdev () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-09-23 21:55:15
Message-ID: 1411509315893-5721339.post () n5 ! nabble ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks blackdrag. Could you tell me which class adds the default map based
constructor to a groovy bean? When this is added, the instantiation works as
expected even when the field in subclass is of type Object but when a map
based constructor is added by @Canonical AST, the properties of super class
are not being set. Does the default map based constructor consider
properties in the parent class?



--
View this message in context: \
http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Fields-in-parent-class-are-not-set-when-calling-map-constructor-of-subclass-when-Canonical-is-present-tp5721326p5721339.html
 Sent from the groovy - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]