[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       groovy-dev
Subject:    Re: [groovy-dev] Re: Closure syntax
From:       Jochen Theodorou <blackdrag () uni ! de>
Date:       2005-01-26 17:07:35
Message-ID: 41F7CE57.6010709 () uni ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Russel Winder schrieb:

> On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 10:33 +0100, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> 
[...]
>>>>        public void foo { |arg1, arg2 |
>>>>                 println ("${arg1} ${arg2});
> 
>>that means you like the above, or not? I think we could do the above to 
>>be more consistent.
> 
> Actually if we are going to be non-Java in procedure definition then I
> would get rid of the prefix return type and do something like:
> 
> def foo { | a, b -> c | . . . }
> 
> where a and be are parameter declarations and c is a type name.

I'm open to this kind of syntax. it would give the "def" more rights to 
exist

bye blackdrag



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]