[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gpa-dev
Subject:    Re: GPA and GPGME
From:       Miguel Coca <e970095 () zipi ! fi ! upm ! es>
Date:       2002-10-30 18:22:54
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 19:14:32 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> The only thing I can suggest is to use either "key is valid" or "key
> is NOT valid" instead of the 4 leves we currently use.  "trustworthy"
> might be an alternative but then you have "trust" back again.

Just committed this. Finally I settled for four levels: "Unknown",
"Revoked", "Expired" and "Fully Valid". If someone thinks there is something
wrong with that, I'd welcome any suggestions.

Also, I rehashed the ownertrust dialog, and added descriptions of what each
trust value does. Maybe someone with a better grasp of English and the
concepts behind ownertrust could suggest better descriptions?

Regards,
-- 
Miguel Coca                                         e970095@zipi.fi.upm.es
PGP Key 0x27FC3CA8                         http://zipi.fi.upm.es/~e970095/

_______________________________________________
Gpa-dev mailing list
Gpa-dev@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gpa-dev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]