[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gobolinux-devel
Subject:    [gobolinux-devel] Re: arts in kde-libs?
From:       hisham.hm () gmail ! com (Hisham Muhammad)
Date:       2006-01-24 17:52:40
Message-ID: 5e7d91620601240858k466ecf28k97c3c09fbbcb7825 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 1/24/06, Andr? Detsch <detsch@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/24/06, Hisham Muhammad <hisham.hm@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 1/24/06, Andr? Detsch <detsch@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 1/24/06, Jonas Karlsson <cj.karlsson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Why is arts included in the kde-libs recipe? Is that necessary or
> could it
> > > > be extracted to be compiled separatly?
> > >
> > > Arts can be compiled separately. Btw, KDE-Libs has to be installed in
> > > the same prefix as Arts (KDE-Libs configure checks this), so we
> > > decided to pack both ('Arts' and 'KDE-Libs-Itself') inside a
> > > 'KDE-Libs' meta recipe.
> >
> > But aren't we compiling all KDE packages with --without-arts now?
>
> No. At least, not yet. But, if this is possible, I am favorable to
> drop arts from kde-libs.

On PPC I compiled it --without-arts (but forgot to remove Arts from
KDE-Libs, d'oh) and now every KDE thing complains if I *don't* pass
--without-arts to it :)

-- Hisham

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]