'Re: Parallel make failure with gnutls-3.0.12'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnutls-dev
Subject:    Re: Parallel make failure with gnutls-3.0.12
From:       Kris Karas <ktk () enterprise ! bidmc ! harvard ! edu>
Date:       2012-01-23 18:55:37
Message-ID: 4F1DAD29.2050503 () enterprise ! bidmc ! harvard ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On 01/22/2012 07:01 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >  Anyway, one solution would be to change this:
> You are correct. I've adopted this version.

For what it's worth, I tried the stamp-enums trick in the makefile, and 
the parallel build worked just fine.  So you can consider the fix 
"acked" by the initial reporter.

Thanks!  :-)

Kris Karas

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#003300">
    Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
    <blockquote cite="mid:4F1BF3CD.2050405@gnutls.org" type="cite">
      <pre wrap="">On 01/22/2012 07:01 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
&gt; Anyway, one solution would be to change this:
</pre>
      <pre wrap="">You are correct. I've adopted this version.</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    For what it's worth, I tried the stamp-enums trick in the makefile,
    and the parallel build worked just fine.   So you can consider the
    fix "acked" by the initial reporter.<br>
    <br>
    Thanks!   :-)<br>
    <br>
    Kris Karas<br>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

_______________________________________________
Gnutls-devel mailing list
Gnutls-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 