[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnuplot-info-beta
Subject:    Re: Feature request: configurable \times/\cdot and a bit about %h
From:       Christoph Bersch <usenet () bersch ! net>
Date:       2013-10-10 12:32:40
Message-ID: 52569E68.6050700 () bersch ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Am 09.10.2013 19:36, schrieb Ethan A Merritt:
>
> At the moment the new code checks for TERM_IS_LATEX and if so
> replaces the default format "%h" with "$%h$".   I.e. it uses the same
> format but wraps it in $...$ so that LaTeX uses numerical mode.
> Would it be a good idea to _always_ do this?   Or maybe always do
> it if the format does not already contain $ signs?

You could wrap the format in $...$ only if it contains only formatting 
specifiers (%...), and these mustn't output any letter (the 'e' in the 
scientific notation should by typeset upright etc.).

This would also break, if one uses macros to format the labels.

Christoph

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
gnuplot-beta mailing list
gnuplot-beta@lists.sourceforge.net
Membership management via: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]