[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnuplot-info-beta
Subject:    Re: bug in x tic number placement
From:       Allin Cottrell <cottrell () wfu ! edu>
Date:       2007-12-14 0:07:37
Message-ID: alpine.LRH.0.999999.0712131906410.10866 () ricardo ! ecn ! wfu ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Ethan Merritt wrote:

> On Thursday 13 December 2007 06:48, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> > But things have regressed in this respect since 4.2.  This script
> > 
> > set term png font Vera 8
> > set output 'foo.png'
> > set xrange [-100000:100000]
> > plot x
> > 
> > produces correct output with 4.2 (i.e. the "100000" marker is 
> > fully visible) but shows truncated output with current CVS.  
> 
> Somehow the word "else" went missing in one clause of the
> boundary calculation.   Fixed in CVS.

Excellent.  Thanks.

Allin Cottrell

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services
for just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
gnuplot-beta mailing list
gnuplot-beta@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]