[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnuplot-info-beta
Subject:    Re: More efficient "dbl_raise"
From:       Daniel J Sebald <daniel.sebald () ieee ! org>
Date:       2007-04-10 0:06:59
Message-ID: 461AD523.8090208 () ieee ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Ethan Merritt wrote:
> I take that to mean you agree that we have no basis on which to say
> that dbl_raise is "better" than pow.

Other than pow() handles NaN and dbl_raise() hangs for five minutes, right.

> Therefore the comment is correct, and nothing needs to be changed.

"is this really useful?" is a comment?

Dan

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
gnuplot-beta mailing list
gnuplot-beta@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]