[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnupg-users
Subject:    keys require a user-id (was: Comparison of RSA vs elliptical keys)
From:       Werner Koch via Gnupg-users <gnupg-users () gnupg ! org>
Date:       2020-05-15 8:48:19
Message-ID: 87mu69a8j0.fsf_-_ () wheatstone ! g10code ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Thu, 14 May 2020 23:01, Stefan Claas said:

> you would consider including it in GnuPG too and reflecting it in the
> respective RFC?

The User-IDs are an integral part of OpenPGP and at the core of its
design.  All kind of important information is bound to the user ids and
thus a key w/o a user ID is basically useless.

There is one exception for this: Derek Atkins (one of the original PGP
authors) requested certain features to allow the use of a stripped down
OpenPGP key by space and CPU constrained devices.  We integrated this
into the standard because it is better to use even a stripped down
format than to come up with just another format.

Direct key signatures were never intended to replace User-IDs and their
self-signatures.

And no, it is not a privacy issue.  If you don't want to put your name
or mail address into the user ID, just don't do it but use a random
string or even the keys fingerprint.  For the majority of use cases a
mail address is still the best way to identify and even lookup a key.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner


-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]