[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnupg-users
Subject:    Re: Newbie can't get --passphrase option to work
From:       Peter Lebbing <peter () digitalbrains ! com>
Date:       2017-05-16 11:41:40
Message-ID: 3c914521-e148-df68-bd29-0c69d0999754 () digitalbrains ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On 16/05/17 13:31, Dan Kegel wrote:
> That wasn't my experience.  I used keys with no passphrase,
> and *still* had to use loopback (and jump through other hoops) to get
> gpg to work unattended.

I was talking about the things one usually does on a headless server,
which is decryption and data signatures. I'm unaware of this having any
issues, and I don't see you mention them in your referenced posts either.

I haven't ever heard unattended certifications being discussed, I don't
know if it is straightforward.

With regards to key management, this is often something a logged in
human user does and can hence do without having to wrestle unattended
stuff. I understand this doesn't always apply, but the OP here was
talking about decryption, not key management. That should be
straightforward.

When I say, by the way, that having no passphrase is better than using a
passphrase which is literally contained in a script, I'm saying that it
is usually better, not that it is always appropriate. It might be
appropriate to solve it in a different way, but a passphrase literally
in a script is probably not it.

HTH,

Peter.

-- 
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter>


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]