[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnupg-users
Subject:    Re: Symmetric encryption - options?
From:       Eric Christensen <eric () christensenplace ! us>
Date:       2012-03-13 12:23:34
Message-ID: CAD9NUJqbPWLecW0roo0cFnYqCJrdQ8UpzXcOYcFbH8vJGSvEag () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Mar 13, 2012 8:15 AM, "Robert J. Hansen" <rjh@sixdemonbag.org> wrote:
>
> On 3/13/2012 7:09 AM, Eric Christensen wrote:
> > Because this is symmetric encryption.  You would need to sign the data
> > to get integrity protection.
>
> This isn't quite right.  He's getting warned about the lack of an MDC,
> which is related to the symmetric algorithm choice.
>

Ahh, yes you are correct.  I was responding without waking up fully...
*yawn*

--Eric

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<p><br>
On Mar 13, 2012 8:15 AM, &quot;Robert J. Hansen&quot; &lt;<a \
href="mailto:rjh@sixdemonbag.org">rjh@sixdemonbag.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br> &gt;<br>
&gt; On 3/13/2012 7:09 AM, Eric Christensen wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; Because this is symmetric encryption.   You would need to sign the data<br>
&gt; &gt; to get integrity protection.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; This isn&#39;t quite right.   He&#39;s getting warned about the lack of an \
MDC,<br> &gt; which is related to the symmetric algorithm choice.<br>
&gt;</p>
<p>Ahh, yes you are correct.   I was responding without waking up fully...   \
*yawn*</p> <p>--Eric</p>



_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]