[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnupg-users
Subject:    Re: Question regarding unknown certificates
From:       Jerome Baum <jerome () jeromebaum ! com>
Date:       2012-01-03 21:37:34
Message-ID: 4F03751E.20408 () jeromebaum ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On 2012-01-03 15:32, Werner Koch wrote:
> No.  There is sufficient information about this available.  For example
> check out the BSI documents pertaining to the qualified signature.

I have read the three paragraphs (out of 165 pages) that "Grundladen der
elektronischen Signatur" spends on this. They say (words to the effect of):

    The law says so.

(I see there could be use-cases for the chain model, as there could be
use-cases for any validity model, but I'm asking if anyone knows a
practical example. I always took gnupg-users to be a user-friendly list
of people happy to help out with general crypto-related questions. In my
mind for most cases the chain model is overly risky, no?)


-- 
PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A
PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA
--
nameserver 217.79.186.148
nameserver 178.63.26.172
http://opennicproject.org/
--
No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]