[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnupg-users
Subject:    Re: Centralizing Private and Public Keys From Multiple Boxes with
From:       Hauke Laging <mailinglisten () hauke-laging ! de>
Date:       2011-04-29 19:23:36
Message-ID: 201104292123.36702.mailinglisten () hauke-laging ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Am Freitag, 29. April 2011, 20:56:49 schrieb Ted Zatopek:

> It looks to me that it's possible to have two private keys in use on the
> same keyring and that you can specify which key to use when you are
> encrypting by using the "-user" switch in your encryption command.

That is correct except for the detail that the option is --local-user or -u.



In order to prevent writing nonsense I checked what "-user" produces. I used 
this command:

gpg --detach-sign -user eccb5814 index.html

I was surprised by the result. gpg created a signature using a key with no 
obvious relation to the command. Additionally I got an error message that 
"eccb5814" was not found (meaning: as a file).

I finally understood by myself that "-user" is interpreted as 
"--local-user ser". Many keys have "ser" in their UIDs.

Does it make sense to accept a parameter for --local-user which is not 
unambiguous? Of course, it says what it is going to do but aborting with a 
clear error message would be user protection IMHO.


Hauke
-- 
PGP: D44C 6A5B 71B0 427C CED3 025C BD7D 6D27 ECCB 5814

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]