[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnupg-users
Subject:    Re: Separate Fingerprint for elGamal-Subkey?
From:       Sven Radde <email () sven-radde ! de>
Date:       2007-10-22 12:24:39
Message-ID: 471C9687.7000404 () sven-radde ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi!

Pitigrilli schrieb:
> I thought that there is only one fingerprint and that this would be
> sufficient to confirm the integrity of the public key.
All your subkeys are signed by your primary key (see "gpg --list-sigs",
the lines with "sig" after each "sub" line).
Therefore, verifying the fingerprints of subkeys is not necessary (or
particularly sensible - IMHO) if the main fingerprint and its signatures
on the subkeys are OK.

cu, Sven

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]