[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnupg-users
Subject:    Re: Are .ems attachments necessary?
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <ingo.kloecker () epost ! de>
Date:       2004-02-06 1:06:43
Message-ID: 200402060206.44455 () erwin ! ingo-kloecker ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Friday 06 February 2004 01:27, Chris Fox wrote:
> Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> | On Friday 06 February 2004 00:14, W. D. wrote:
> |>I just joined this group a few days ago, and am finding
> |>that some of the email messages are contained in .ems
> |>attachments.
>
> But there's nothing wrong with Eudora's handling of the signature
> files; they show as attachments in every mailer I know of.

Well, apparently it's not the signatures that are shown as attachments 
but the messages. OTOH, my message was just a wild guess. So it might 
be something else than PGP/MIME messages that cause the confusion.

Regards,
Ingo

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]