[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnupg-devel
Subject:    Re: Removing v3 support from 2.1 (was: Disable importing V3 public keys from keyservers)
From:       Dan Haskin <djhaskin987 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-10-13 1:54:37
Message-ID: CA+gNq51WiBgQ33x=s+a0oTXfEfGA9Z=C8ambf8mSKx5=wz=-Fg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Bear in mind, it was already deprecated in 1.4. The argument could be made
that we don't need to deprecate it in the 2.x line, as it was already
deprecated in the 1.x line, and therefore a version bump is not needed.

Daniel Jay Haskin
http://djhaskin987.github.io/

On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:47 PM, <lists-gnupgdev@lina.inka.de> wrote:

> Am Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:35:16 +0200
> schrieb Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>:
>
> > If my counting is correct, your are the third voice agerring to remove
> > all v3 support from 2.1.  I am also in favor of this.
>
> I am all for removing it, but I think this warrants a major verion
> bump. And since we should not come up with more stuff to delay 2.1, why
> not release it quickly with only a deprecation warning and follow up
> with a clean 3.0
>
> Gruss
> Bernd
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-devel mailing list
> Gnupg-devel@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel
>

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" \
style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:#000000">Bear in mind, it was \
already deprecated in 1.4. The argument could be made that we don&#39;t need to \
deprecate it in the 2.x line, as it was already deprecated in the 1.x line, and \
therefore a version bump is not needed.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br \
clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr">Daniel Jay Haskin<br><a \
href="http://djhaskin987.github.io/" \
target="_blank">http://djhaskin987.github.io/</a><br></div></div> <br><div \
class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:47 PM,  <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a \
href="mailto:lists-gnupgdev@lina.inka.de" \
target="_blank">lists-gnupgdev@lina.inka.de</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">Am Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:35:16 +0200<br> schrieb Werner Koch \
&lt;<a href="mailto:wk@gnupg.org" target="_blank">wk@gnupg.org</a>&gt;:<br> <br>
&gt; If my counting is correct, your are the third voice agerring to remove<br>
&gt; all v3 support from 2.1.   I am also in favor of this.<br>
<br>
I am all for removing it, but I think this warrants a major verion<br>
bump. And since we should not come up with more stuff to delay 2.1, why<br>
not release it quickly with only a deprecation warning and follow up<br>
with a clean 3.0<br>
<br>
Gruss<br>
Bernd<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Gnupg-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gnupg-devel@gnupg.org" target="_blank">Gnupg-devel@gnupg.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel" \
target="_blank">http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel</a><br> \
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>



_______________________________________________
Gnupg-devel mailing list
Gnupg-devel@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]