[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnupg-devel
Subject:    Re: OpenPGP sig notations - IANA registry vs. seen-in-the-wild
From:       David Shaw <dshaw () jabberwocky ! com>
Date:       2010-01-26 5:28:36
Message-ID: 70F61636-11A7-46BE-A7E3-4458F007D0AC () jabberwocky ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:18 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:

> The RFC's describe the creation of a registry, but the most I can find
> is an empty one:
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/pgp-parameters/pgp-parameters.xhtml#pgp-parameters-6
>  
> ===
> 10.2.2.1.  Signature Notation Data Subpackets
> ... Notations contain a user space that is completely unmanaged and an IETF space.
> ===
> 
> 1. Are there ANY IETF-registered notations?

No.

> 2. I'm also looking for seen-in-the-wild notations, esp. common ones.

There are a whole bunch of "COMMENT" out there, which would be an illegal notation \
(not registered with IANA, and does not contain a '@').  Legal ones include \
preferred-email-encoding@pgp.com and pka-address@gnupg.org.  I'm sure there are \
others.

David


_______________________________________________
Gnupg-devel mailing list
Gnupg-devel@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]