[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnupg-devel
Subject:    AW: Smartcards, one alternative solution to it..?
From:       "thomas schorpp" <t.schorpp () gmx ! de>
Date:       2003-08-21 18:48:57
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: gnupg-devel-admin@gnupg.org [mailto:gnupg-devel-admin@gnupg.org]Im
> Auftrag von Janusz A. Urbanowicz
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2003 20:20
> An: thomas schorpp
> Cc: Gnupg-Devel; Winpt-Users; Winpt-Dev; Gnupg-Users
> Betreff: Re: Smartcards, one alternative solution to it..?
>
>
> > for workstation:
> >
> > what about booting a secure protected mode virtual machine minimal open
> > source linux box within a normal-use os?
> > all security software and secure shells, mails, document
> editors running in
> > this box?
> > modern processors protected mode should work well...
>
> You are reinventing MS Palladium/NGSCB here.

if i read the msdn right, thats not the thing i suggested, cause its no real
pm, even if running from processor ring 0.
and the politics behind that is a completly different, you know it.
locking safe pages in virtual menory has pgp already done...?

>
> > is there a open counterpart to vmware?
>
> Bochs86.

thx.

>
> > maybe a solution.
>
> It is not a solution.

why?, please let me learn...
please tell me your alternative to smartcards.

>
> Alex
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-devel mailing list
> Gnupg-devel@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32) - WinPT 0.7.96

iEYEAREDAAYFAj9FE/QACgkQzvbvBTHiGrpwpQCgmowkNvxU1QsFecIv39THRVuM
kBgAoJdjAB8D/46Fzq53pMZ2ua76o/PR
=tOAi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Gnupg-devel mailing list
Gnupg-devel@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]