[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnash-dev
Subject:    Re: [Gnash-dev] No rule to make target
From:       "Asger Ottar Alstrup" <asger () area9 ! dk>
Date:       2007-12-01 16:40:45
Message-ID: 8873ae500712010840j68274cdbk50e1c3b21b9f9437 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Dec 1, 2007 11:17 AM, strk <strk@keybit.net> wrote:

> Sorry, it was probably before I committed the fix, please try again
> after an update.
>

I can confirm that the problem has been fixed. Now, most of the Arctic
examples work. The other problems I listed about GradientFill and mouse_hide
are still there. I'll try to submit a test case for the gradient fill
Monday.

The performance of Gnash is pretty bad compared to the Adobe Flash player.
It takes many, many seconds to build the screen in some of the bigger Arctic
examples. I would think it's probably 50 times slower than the Adobe Flash
player.

Regards,
Asger

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

On Dec 1, 2007 11:17 AM, strk &lt;<a \
href="mailto:strk@keybit.net">strk@keybit.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br><div \
class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid \
rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Sorry, it was \
probably before I committed the fix, please try again<br>after an update.<br><font \
color="#888888"></font></blockquote><div><br>I can confirm that the problem has been \
fixed. Now, most of the Arctic examples work. The other problems I listed about \
GradientFill and mouse_hide are still there. I&#39;ll try to submit a test case for \
the gradient fill Monday. <br><br>The performance of Gnash is pretty bad compared to \
the Adobe Flash player. It takes many, many seconds to build the screen in some of \
the bigger Arctic examples. I would think it&#39;s probably 50 times slower than the \
Adobe Flash player. <br><br>Regards,<br>Asger<br><br></div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]