[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gmp-discuss
Subject: GPGPU support
From: arndt () jjj ! de (Joerg Arndt)
Date: 2010-10-12 13:12:22
Message-ID: 20101012131222.GA3328 () jjj ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
* Morten Gulbrandsen <Morten.Gulbrandsen at rwth-Aachen.DE> [Oct 12. 2010 14:23]:
> [...]
>
> My question is: will many cores or paralell computing help with
> gmp-Chudnowski? Just for comparison? Why is not the number of cores
> reported? I assume all results was 64 bits as an increase from 32 bits
> to 64 bits will speedup with a factor four times.
>
> If so, (if multi-core speeds up) I think we should go for it, If Not,
> if the same results are achieved with one core as with many cores, I'll
> look for a different approach.
I'd suggest multi-core is the way to go.
Using the ideas given in
sect.21.10 (pp.438-439)
sect.22.5 (pp.451-454) [there especially sect.22.5.5]
of the fxtbook should lead to a multi-thread FFT which
can be made to work with external storage.
Note the float-FFT should be replaced by (e.g.)
3 NTTs (for the 3-primes algorithm).
Also look at sect.25.8 (pp.529-530):
the technique gave me a 50% speedup with
the multiplication for a high-precision
floating point library.
>
>
>
> Sincerely yours,
>
> ??? ??????
> Morten Gulbrandsen
> [...]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic