[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gluster-devel
Subject:    [Gluster-devel] RFC - "Connection Groups" concept
From:       jclift () redhat ! com (Justin Clift)
Date:       2013-08-15 15:59:02
Message-ID: BEAF0542-83EC-4C8C-BC1A-531512E2C46B () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 28/06/2013, at 3:56 AM, Ian Latter wrote:
<snip>
> Let's take the grouping proposal for example - what's the difference between the \
> proposed (a host UUID plus a group/interface identifier) and a per-interface alias? \
>  
> node1.gluster.org 10.1.1.100 6b481ebb-859a-4c2b-8b5f-8f0bba7c3b9a-group1
> 
> Perhaps gluster should drive toward something that already exists in storage - like \
> World Wide Names (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Name) for the internal \
> uniqueness required at the storage management layer that is independent of the \
> transport (don't implement WWPN, since you're already on a dynamic/IP network): a \
> virtual HBA - something unrelated to the networking of the device at both the \
> consumption and administration layers; \
> http://geekswing.com/geek/linux/how-to-find-fiber-host-bus-adapter-fiber-hba-wwn-on-linux/
> 


Reading through this again, interesting idea.  Worthing
considering / thinking through. :)

+ Justin

--
Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat

twitter.com/realjustinclift


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]