[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       glibc-locales
Subject:    [PATCH] small changes for fa_IR
From:       pere () hungry ! com (Petter Reinholdtsen)
Date:       2004-03-21 10:45:00
Message-ID: 2flk71ewkaz.fsf () saruman ! uio ! no
[Download RAW message or body]

[Hamed Malek]
> -category  "fa_IR:2002";LC_IDENTIFICATION
> +category  "fa_IR:2004";LC_IDENTIFICATION

Isn't the category field supposed to include a reference to the
standard used, and not the locale name and the year of the last
change?  I'm aware that almost all locales are incorrect in this
regard, but plan to change it.  I suspect this is the more correct
content:

  category  "i18n:<year of publication>";LC_IDENTIFICATION

or

  category  "posix:<year of publication>";LC_IDENTIFICATION

I have a patch for ld-identification.c to check the content, but
haven't submitted it yet as I do not really know the allowed list of
standard references.  Am I mistaken?


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]