[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       glibc-alpha
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] Require bison 2.7 or newer for regenerating intl/plural.y
From:       "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos () redhat ! com>
Date:       2014-12-30 19:31:07
Message-ID: 54A2FD7B.4020300 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 12/17/2014 05:21 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 17:13 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> 
>> You can approve it yourself! This is a consensus-based project.
>>
>> Review Will's patch, and between the two of you can decide if the
>> patch is simple enough, and obvious enough that two people agreeing
>> constitutes consensus for the fix.
>>
>> We want to keep gettext in sync, and if that means bison 2.7, then that's
>> fine. Bison 2.7 has been around for two years and is quite stable.
>> The two of you could have come to that conclusion and checked in the change.
>>
>> Please empower yourself to review code and help others checkin their changes.
>>
>> Cheres,
>> Carlos.
> 
> Huh, I don't think I ever noticed that glibc doesn't have official
> maintainers like GCC does.

We are a smaller community. You've been contributing long enough that
we know where to find you ;-)

Cheers,
Carlos.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]