[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       glibc-alpha
Subject:    Re: Incorrect __THROW markers
From:       Daniel Jacobowitz <drow () false ! org>
Date:       2004-11-27 23:17:15
Message-ID: 20041127231714.GA5265 () nevyn ! them ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 11:23:54AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > Is this patch OK?
> 
> Seems to be, I applied it.
> 
> > If it is, are changelogs at this level of detail necessary?
> 
> Yes, but the format was off.

OK, I'll try to remember that.  Is this a glibc-specific policy?
standards.texi says:

Break long lists of function names by closing continued lines with
@samp{)}, rather than @samp{,}, and opening the continuation with
@samp{(} as in this example:

@example
* keyboard.c (menu_bar_items, tool_bar_items)
(Fexecute_extended_command): Deal with `keymap' property.
@end example

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]