[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       glibc-alpha
Subject:    Re: [Patch] Unterminated .eh_frame when using --eh-frame-hdr
From:       Ulrich Drepper <drepper () redhat ! com>
Date:       2004-11-23 22:43:41
Message-ID: 41A3BD1D.9000007 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Richard Henderson wrote:

> Patch looks good to me and to diffstat (224 deletions, 0 additions).
> Uli, what do you think?

I don't have any insight into what compilers/runtimes this excludes.
Since these tests should not disturb anything I'm inclined to leave it
in until we have the next bigger gcc requirement bump.

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBo70d2ijCOnn/RHQRAsSFAJ4tMsH7inPeDIdFkpxp2yz80m+LcQCgnST4
sGgbfeSj7agYPEp9EqrhFxM=
=hDnq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]