[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       git
Subject:    Re: "git add -u" broken in git 1.7.4?
From:       Jeff King <peff () peff ! net>
Date:       2011-02-10 2:31:32
Message-ID: 20110210023132.GB5073 () sigill ! intra ! peff ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:24:55AM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:

> > I don't think it's worth moving ls-files/ls-tree. They're plumbing that
> > people don't use frequently. So the cost of moving them is high (because
> > we are breaking something meant to be scriptable) and the benefit is low
> > (because users don't type them a lot).
> 
> No we should not, but we should add --full-tree to
> ls-files/ls-tree/archive. I'd love "ls-files --full-tree
> '*somefile*'".

ls-tree already has --full-tree (and --full-name, which just gives full
pathnames but still restricts output to files in the current directory).
ls-files. ls-files has --full-name, but AFAIK needs a matching
--full-tree.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]