[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       git
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] Add support in sample hook script for denying annotated
From:       Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-10-31 20:24:33
Message-ID: 20101031202433.GB21240 () burratino
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:

> Signed-off-by: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss@iguanasuicide.net>
> ---
>  templates/hooks--update.sample |    9 +++++++++
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> In one project I'm in we are using a centralized Git repository that many 
> developers have access to.  As such, we want to prevent tags from being 
> created by push operations and have them created by the administrators.
> 
> This is a modification to the sample update hook to allow this to simply be 
> a configuration option.

This kind of justification belongs above the "---", I think.

No opinion on the functionality itself.  Just:

> --- a/templates/hooks--update.sample
> +++ b/templates/hooks--update.sample
> @@ -7,6 +7,9 @@
>  #
>  # Config
>  # ------
> +# hooks.allowannotated
> +#   This boolean sets whether annotated tags will be allowed into the
> +#   repository.  By default they won't be.

hooks.denyannotated (defaulting to false) would be more consistent
with hooks.denycreatebranch, no?

Or maybe hooks.denycreatetag --- a situation in which unannotated
tags should be allowed but annotated denied seems hard to imagine.

Hope that helps,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]