[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: git
Subject: Re: drawbacks to svn server + git-svn vs git server?
From: Tim Mazid <timmazid () hotmail ! com>
Date: 2009-10-31 20:59:16
Message-ID: 26093326.post () talk ! nabble ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi,
I recently migrated from svn to git as well, but I've abandoned the svn
server altogether.
What I noticed is that the merges do not show up properly when you look at
the svn repo with git. Obviously because svn doesn't track that information.
I assume that such a problem would continue if you continued using the svn
server.
Personally, i would recommend migrating to git altogether, it isn't actually
that difficult. The only issue I had was fixing up the merges.
Sorry I can't be of more help, I'm just letting you know what issues I faced
with svn.
Good luck,
Tim.
Dexter Riley wrote:
>
> Hello. My group is currently using subversion on our version control
> server, but would like to move to git as a client. We are considering
> using git-svn, to avoid revalidating the server software. My question is,
> are there any major disadvantages to using git-svn versus git? I know
> that the git repository would be smaller. I'm more concerned about
> possible svn repository corruption, performance when pushing large merges
> back to svn, and any gotchas you might have encountered.
> Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Ed
>
--
View this message in context: \
http://old.nabble.com/drawbacks-to-svn-server-%2B-git-svn-vs-git-server--tp25994334p26093326.html
Sent from the git mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic