[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: git
Subject: Strange branch merging.
From: Adam Panayis <adam () movency ! com>
Date: 2009-02-12 11:52:51
Message-ID: 49940D93.6000204 () movency ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi, I have just started using git and am having a problem with 2
branches appearing merged.
I have a local machine, on this I have 2 branches. The master and one
named blah. My git repository is in the following location: /git/.git/
I have made changes to a file on the blah branch and committed these
changes.
I checkout the master branch and as expected the changes are no longer
there. I flip back to blah and I can see my changes. So far so good.
I then, on a remote machine use the pull command, the remote machine
shows only the master branch as I have not asked it to pull blah. The
command I use is as follows: git pull -v ssh://user@machine one/git/.git/
Once this is done I double check my branches and it shows I still only
have the master. Perfect. However, when I check the file I edited on my
local machine on the blah branch, the changes are there.
Am I fundamentally misunderstanding the correct usage of git? Is this
result expected?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic