On Donnerstag, 21. August 2008, Brandon Casey wrote: > Johannes Sixt wrote: > > diff --git a/git-filter-branch.sh b/git-filter-branch.sh > > index 2688254..81392ad 100755 > > --- a/git-filter-branch.sh > > +++ b/git-filter-branch.sh > > @@ -412,15 +412,17 @@ if [ "$filter_tag_name" ]; then > > echo "$ref -> $new_ref ($sha1 -> $new_sha1)" > > > > if [ "$type" = "tag" ]; then > > - new_sha1=$(git cat-file tag "$ref" | > > + new_sha1=$( ( printf 'object %s\ntype commit\ntag %s\n' \ > > + "$new_sha1" "$new_ref" > > + git cat-file tag "$ref" | > > sed -n \ > > -e "1,/^$/{ > > - s/^object .*/object $new_sha1/ > > - s/^type .*/type commit/ > > - s/^tag .*/tag $new_ref/ > > + /^object /d > > + /^type /d > > + /^tag /d > > Junio complained that my initial version of this was fragile which has > similarities with the above. Initially, I was blindly changing the first > line to contain "object...", second line to "type...", etc. I don't see what's wrong with that. "object" must be the first line anyway, otherwise git mktag chokes. > Would something like the following be equivalent _and_ clearer? Emphasis on > "and" because both are necessary, not because I strongly feel it to be so. > > diff --git a/git-filter-branch.sh b/git-filter-branch.sh > index a324cf0..11c5c04 100755 > --- a/git-filter-branch.sh > +++ b/git-filter-branch.sh > @@ -419,9 +419,12 @@ if [ "$filter_tag_name" ]; then > new_sha1=$(git cat-file tag "$ref" | > sed -n \ > -e "1,/^$/{ > - s/^object .*/object $new_sha1/ > - s/^type .*/type commit/ > - s/^tag .*/tag $new_ref/ > + /^object .*/c\\ > +object $new_sha1 > + /^type .*/c\\ > +type commit > + /^tag .*/c\\ > +tag $new_ref > }" \ > -e '/^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----/q' \ > -e 'p' | This looks fine, too. (The '.*' in /^foo .*/c\\ is unnecessary.) -- Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html