[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       git
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-gc.txt: change --aggressive
From:       Teemu Likonen <tlikonen () iki ! fi>
Date:       2008-05-13 10:57:28
Message-ID: 20080513105728.GA3088 () mithlond ! arda ! local
[Download RAW message or body]

Pieter de Bie wrote (2008-05-13 11:53 +0200):

> I keep seeing people regularly packing their repo with git gc
> --aggressive. However, in my experience, this seldom results in
> a smaller repository. This can be because the repository was repacked
> tightly previously (for example, with a high --window value) or
> because incremental "git gc" just makes better packs anyway. Throwing
> away that information is often not a good idea.
> 
> The documentation for the --aggressive flag was misleading, in that it
> hints that you'll get a smaller pack, which is often not the case.

This patch might be a good thing. But from ordinary user's point of view
this raises questions: if gc --aggressive really is not that aggressive
then the option itself is misleading. Why not change gc --aggressive to
be really effective? Using high --window/--depth value etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]