[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       git
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] git-stash: Display help message if git-stash is run without sub-commands
From:       David Kastrup <dak () gnu ! org>
Date:       2007-11-30 20:11:14
Message-ID: 85mysvwl25.fsf () lola ! goethe ! zz
[Download RAW message or body]

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> "Kevin Leung" <kevinlsk@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Nov 30, 2007 4:41 PM, Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> wrote:
>>> Still, 'git stash' alone should *do* the stash.
>>>
>>
>> How about `git stash' still does the stash, and `git stash llist'
>> exits with usage message? And if you want to save the stash with name,
>> you can only do it with `git stash save name_of_stash'.
>
> Sounds like a sensible thing to do.

Instead of "save", one could use "stash" since that is what it is
supposed to do.  Then

git stash stash stash

would create a stash called "stash".

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]