[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       geronimo-dev
Subject:    Re: Safeguard feature branch?
From:       Jean-Baptiste_Onofré <jb () nanthrax ! net>
Date:       2018-11-21 13:54:00
Message-ID: d635438e-4cc6-5464-acfa-6ba12ea433da () nanthrax ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

+1 as well

Regards
JB

On 21/11/2018 14:36, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> +1 for master
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
> 
> 
> Le mer. 21 nov. 2018 à 14:24, Bruno Baptista <brunobat@gmail.com
> <mailto:brunobat@gmail.com>> a écrit :
> 
>     Hi All,
> 
>     I'd like to start pushing PRs into Safeguard, implementing the latest
>     features of the FT spec.
> 
>     I need to change the TCK version and that branch will be broken for a
>     while...
> 
>     Should we create a feature branch and then merge to master when ready
>     or, should we just send the PRs to the  master?
> 
>     Cheers.
> 
>     -- 
>     Bruno Baptista
>     https://twitter.com/brunobat_
> 
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]