[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       geronimo-dev
Subject:    Re: JSR-375 - Java EE Security API
From:       Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau () gmail ! com>
Date:       2018-11-02 12:42:35
Message-ID: CACLE=7M3WUVxGPaESU+vAN2ZR5R3iiha1WhKP+9zQ7_mSOrbkg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Not AFAIK, there is no much love for this spec

Le ven. 2 nov. 2018 13:06, Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com> a écrit :

> Thanks!
>
> Is there an incubator or subproject for it already?
>
> On 2 Nov 2018, at 07:47, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Roberto,
>
> Likely and also an incubator or subproject implementing it. A good working
> pattern is to do the impl and keep the api next to it until passing tck.
> This allows to document the api etc properly (reminder being we cant copy
> the ri) while implementing it. Once all green we give it back to geronimo
> for the standard integration.
>
>
>
> Le ven. 2 nov. 2018 00:21, Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com> a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was looking into the geronimo-specs projects here:
>> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs
>>
>> Shouldn't we have an API for JSR-375 - Java EE Security API as well, like
>> this?
>> https://github.com/javaee/security-api (now moved to Jakarta EE)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Roberto
>>
>>
>

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="auto">Not AFAIK, there is no much love for this spec</div><br><div \
class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Le ven. 2 nov. 2018 13:06, Roberto Cortez &lt;<a \
href="mailto:radcortez@yahoo.com">radcortez@yahoo.com</a>&gt; a écrit  \
:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px \
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div \
style="word-wrap:break-word"><div>Thanks!</div><div><br></div><div>Is there an \
incubator or subproject for it already?</div><br><div><blockquote type="cite"><div>On \
2 Nov 2018, at 07:47, Romain Manni-Bucau &lt;<a href="mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com" \
target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">rmannibucau@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br \
class="m_7337092429941797598Apple-interchange-newline"><div><div dir="auto">Hi \
Roberto,<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Likely and also an incubator or \
subproject implementing it. A good working pattern is to do the impl and keep the api \
next to it until passing tck. This allows to document the api etc properly (reminder \
being we cant copy the ri) while implementing it. Once all green we give it back to \
geronimo for the standard integration.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div \
dir="auto"><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Le ven. 2 nov. \
2018 00:21, Roberto Cortez &lt;<a href="mailto:radcortez@yahoo.com" target="_blank" \
rel="noreferrer">radcortez@yahoo.com</a>&gt; a écrit  :<br></div><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">Hi,<div><br></div><div>I \
was looking into the geronimo-specs projects here:</div><div><a \
href="https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs</a></div><div><br></div><div>Shouldn't \
we have an API for  JSR-375 - Java EE Security API as well, like this?</div><div><a \
href="https://github.com/javaee/security-api" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://github.com/javaee/security-api</a>  (now moved to Jakarta \
EE)</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Roberto</div><div><br></div></div></blockquote></div>
 </div></blockquote></div><br></div></blockquote></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]