[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-user
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Pipewire not a dependency?
From:       Mark Knecht <markknecht () gmail ! com>
Date:       2022-10-01 14:57:03
Message-ID: CAK2H+eeuAY6conXMfK0BZn7igfBmW4cabaTEFdvqAB-snJtGUg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 7:51 AM Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 1 October 2022 15:08:40 BST Michael wrote:
> > On Thursday, 29 September 2022 15:11:02 BST Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > > On 28/09/2022 13:57, Michael wrote:
> > > > I'm trying to understand why one laptop with Plasma which had
> pulseaudio
> > > > removed, won't bring in pipewire as a dependency.  I have set USE="-
> > > > screencast", because I don't need/want this functionality, as I have
> > > > done
> > > > on other systems which nevertheless have had pipewire brought in as
a
> > > > dependency.
> > >
> > > Probably some other package pulls it in directly, independent of the
> > > screencast USE flag. For example media-sound/easyeffects.
> >
> > I just looked and a pipewire(d) system has only a few additional audio
> > applications, spek, vidcutter, easytag, none of which seem to bring in
> > pipewire.  I think I'll have to install it manually on the system which
> > doesn't bring it in as some dependency.  Somehow I was under the
impression
> > it comes with Plasma these days, but perhaps I have stripped down this
> > Plasma/kde installation too much.
>
> I have no pipewire on this fairly standard Plasma box.
>

I believe that pipewire, as far as KDE users are concerned, is a
distro choice about when to use it.

My Kubuntu boxes started using it recently. I had no issues and
didn't need to change any settings for any application that makes
use of sound.

YMMV,
Mark

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><br><br>On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 7:51 AM Peter Humphrey &lt;<a \
href="mailto:peter@prh.myzen.co.uk">peter@prh.myzen.co.uk</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br>&gt;<br>&gt; On Saturday, 1 October 2022 15:08:40 BST Michael \
wrote:<br>&gt; &gt; On Thursday, 29 September 2022 15:11:02 BST Nikos Chantziaras \
wrote:<br>&gt; &gt; &gt; On 28/09/2022 13:57, Michael wrote:<br>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; \
I&#39;m trying to understand why one laptop with Plasma which had<br>&gt; \
pulseaudio<br>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; removed, won&#39;t bring in pipewire as a \
dependency.   I have set USE=&quot;-<br>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; screencast&quot;, because \
I don&#39;t need/want this functionality, as I have<br>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; \
done<br>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; on other systems which nevertheless have had pipewire \
brought in as a<br>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; dependency.<br>&gt; &gt; &gt;<br>&gt; &gt; \
&gt; Probably some other package pulls it in directly, independent of the<br>&gt; \
&gt; &gt; screencast USE flag. For example media-sound/easyeffects.<br>&gt; \
&gt;<br>&gt; &gt; I just looked and a pipewire(d) system has only a few additional \
audio<br>&gt; &gt; applications, spek, vidcutter, easytag, none of which seem to \
bring in<br>&gt; &gt; pipewire.   I think I&#39;ll have to install it manually on the \
system which<br>&gt; &gt; doesn&#39;t bring it in as some dependency.   Somehow I was \
under the impression<br>&gt; &gt; it comes with Plasma these days, but perhaps I have \
stripped down this<br>&gt; &gt; Plasma/kde installation too much.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; I \
have no pipewire on this fairly standard Plasma box.<br>&gt;<br><br><div>I believe \
that pipewire, as far as KDE users are concerned, is a  </div><div>distro choice \
about when to use it.</div><div><br></div><div>My Kubuntu boxes started using it \
recently. I had no issues and  </div><div>didn&#39;t need to change any settings for \
any application that makes  </div><div>use of \
sound.</div><div><br></div><div>YMMV,</div><div>Mark</div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic