[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-user
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues
From:       Rafa Griman <rafagriman () gmail ! com>
Date:       2012-05-30 20:17:03
Message-ID: CANRt_=bqfqaDs3K1yDap_a-hA_Gsq+y_nn5KZbf2q_j20F3xag () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Florian Philipp <lists@binarywings.net> wrote:
> Am 29.05.2012 23:37, schrieb Rafa Griman:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:56:07 +0200
>>> Rafa Griman <rafagriman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Vaeth :)
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Vaeth
>>>> <vaeth@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Your gawk is broken. This happens if you emerged gawk with
>>>>> current gcc and aggressive FLAGS like -DNDEBUG or -flto.
>>>>> Not sure whether it is a bug of gawk or gcc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So it seems to be the CFLAGS :( As I said in my previous e-mail, I was
>>>> "experimenting" a bit with them ... I'll be more conservative ;)
>>>
>>> Well, on the one hand the flags don;t seem to be too bad overall, but
>>> on the other hand there's the golden rule of Gentoo:
>>>
>>> Don't stuff around with CFLAGS
>>>
>>> Why not? Well, there's the ricer phenomenon where changed CFLAGS
>>> worsen performance and stability but the user's own bias convinces
>>> him/her that it's actually vastly improved.
>>
>>
>> I know that rule and tried not to be too agressive but seems I was O:)
>> Since it's not my min machine, I was going to experiment (nothing
>> "scientific", just curiosity) trying different options on different
>> partitions and see how they work out.
>>
>
> Out of curiosity: What flags do you run now? Do you know which flag
> exactly caused the problem? They didn't seem too experimental though
> -fno-inline looked odd.


That one's it: -fno-inline. Removed it and now the error disappears.
revdep-rebuild runs well now.

Thanks all !!!

   Rafa

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]