[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-user
Subject:    Re: Devs and rice flags (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -j, make -j
From:       Pandu Poluan <pandu () poluan ! info>
Date:       2011-11-29 1:07:59
Message-ID: CAA2qdGWoppBa_rso-fBonFyuA5WWLtj7nMQb8uwBiegGtNg6uA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Nov 29, 2011 2:53 AM, "Michael Mol" <mikemol@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
> >
> > I use Intel boxes, unfortunately.
>
> Are you using a 64-bit x86-derived system? Same difference in this
> context. AMD hit the market with a good 64-bit x86-based ISA first,
> and devs started calling it AMD64 then. That's mostly stuck even after
> Intel released a mostly-compatible competitor, EM64T.
>

Ah, okay. I misunderstood your question. (Brain shutting down at 0230 in
the morning).

Rgds,

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<p><br>
On Nov 29, 2011 2:53 AM, &quot;Michael Mol&quot; &lt;<a \
href="mailto:mikemol@gmail.com">mikemol@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br> &gt;<br>
&gt; On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Pandu Poluan &lt;<a \
href="mailto:pandu@poluan.info">pandu@poluan.info</a>&gt; wrote:<br> &gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; I use Intel boxes, unfortunately.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Are you using a 64-bit x86-derived system? Same difference in this<br>
&gt; context. AMD hit the market with a good 64-bit x86-based ISA first,<br>
&gt; and devs started calling it AMD64 then. That&#39;s mostly stuck even after<br>
&gt; Intel released a mostly-compatible competitor, EM64T.<br>
&gt;</p>
<p>Ah, okay. I misunderstood your question. (Brain shutting down at 0230 in the \
morning).</p> <p>Rgds,<br>
</p>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]