[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-user
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-user] cgroupd really do work!
From:       Florian Philipp <lists () f_philipp ! fastmail ! net>
Date:       2010-12-05 14:55:33
Message-ID: 4CFBA7E5.8060101 () f_philipp ! fastmail ! net
[Download RAW message or body]


Am 04.12.2010 22:00, schrieb Mark Knecht:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:16 PM, William Kenworthy <billk@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 17:20 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 4:41 PM, William Kenworthy <billk@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>>>> Re the discussion on cgroups on the 24/25 november - on my old AMD
>>>> barton 2500+ desktop - in the past a load of anything more than 5 made
>>>> it very painful to use.  Add in running windows in a qemu vm at the same
>>>> time (all in 1.5G ram) and its almost unusable as an interactive
>>>> desktop.
>>>>
>>>> Now, with Florians (thanks for the scripts) version of using it on
>>>> gentoo, even at a load in excess of 12, its almost as good as with no
>>>> load for desktop operations!
>>>>
>>>> To get the high load I am compiling a new kernel, running win2k in qemu,
>>>> emerging latest updates, browsing the web and reading email in
>>>> evolution, running updatedb and other cron jobs (just restarted after a
>>>> tuxonice hibernate so everything is triggering at once!).
>>>>
>>>> Really, really, really neat!
>>>> BillK
>>>
[...]
> 
> If you're up for it maybe try putting doing a Gentoo Wiki page.
> 
> Sounds like it's working pretty well. I'd like to try it but I don't
> have much time to focus on digging out the info.
> 
> Congrats!
> -Mark
> 

As you wish:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Improve_responsiveness_with_cgroups

I welcome any improvements. This is my first wiki article and English is
not my mother tongue.

Hope this helps,
Florian Philipp


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]