[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-qa
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-qa] QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a
From:       Diego Elio =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9CFlameeyes=E2=80=9D_?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Petten=F2?= <
Date:       2010-08-21 19:47:35
Message-ID: 1282420055.445.54.camel () yamato ! local
[Download RAW message or body]

Il giorno sab, 21/08/2010 alle 14.11 -0400, Mark Loeser ha scritto:
> 
> #2 seems to alleviate any bottlenecks that could happen.  What does
> everyone else think?  This can wait until after whatever is decided
> with
> the election, but the conversation should take place regardless. 

I agree that #2 sounds the best.

In case we all agree on that, should we ask devrel nicely to write that
down on their own policy or do we have to pass through council?

-- 
Diego Elio Pettenò — "Flameeyes"
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is,
it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/




[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]